Document Type : Original Article
Author
Member of the Faculty of Theology and Philosophy of Religion Department of Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute
Abstract
In order to revive the role of religion in the field of science and confront secular science, some Muslim thinkers emphasize the Islamization of science. Based on this, it is necessary to examine and choose the most valid theory in the mentioned field. Mohammad Amara Nomutzali and Ayatollah Misbah have proposed theoretical sciences for Islamization. In this research, with a descriptive and analytical method, focusing on the works of these two personalities, we will do a comparative and critical examination of their opinions in the aforementioned field. Dividing sciences into neutral sciences and sciences with the ability to become religious and Islamicizing the sciences of the second part in the light of Islamizing their epistemological, ontological, anthropological, theological and value-based foundations and Islamizing the applied part of science is one of the common points of view of these two thinkers. Among the points of difference between these two thinkers are things like Ayatollah Misbah's belief that the Sunnah of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon him) is a source for the Islamization of sciences, and Amara's disbelief in it, and Ayatollah Misbah's view on the neutrality of the descriptive part of the human sciences with regard to Islamization and its non-neutrality from the point of view of It is a building. Another result of this research is that Ayatollah Mesbah and Amara's view on the neutrality of natural sciences towards Islamization is not justified.
Keywords