Document Type : Original Article
Author
J.Z
Abstract
Imamat is a central tenet of Shi'a belief, established through both intellectual and scriptural proofs. In his book "Shiism," the German orientalist Heinz Halm examines various Shi'a doctrines, including the Imamate. As the research of contemporary orientalists is increasingly studied and referenced by scholars in Islamic sciences, a critical analysis of Halm's views on the Imamate is vital. This process helps inform researchers about the authentic foundations of Imami thought. Therefore, the core question of this investigation is: "What is the analytical critique of Heinz Halm's views on the Imamate in his book 'Shiism'?"
The research, conducted using library resources and a descriptive-critical methodology, found that Halm's interpretation of the Imamate is problematic. Regarding the general concept (Imamat al-'Ammah), he reduces it to a purely socio-political phenomenon, limits its purpose to resistance against ruling powers, and diminishes the Imam's status to that of a mere political leader.
Concerning the specific doctrine (Imamat al-Khassah), Halm's views include: overlooking the principle of divine appointment (nass), questioning the clear designation of each Imam, and suggesting that the belief in the Twelve Imams developed gradually within the early community. The study concludes that all aspects of Halm's perspective on the Imamate, both general and specific, are open to analytical critique. His positions can be effectively challenged through a framework of rational argument, decisive evidence from authoritative Islamic texts (the Qur'an and authentic Prophetic traditions), and a rigorous analysis of historical narratives that collectively affirm the divinely-instituted and essential role of the Imamate in Shi'a theology.
Keywords